Interviews, retro notes, and anonymized tickets fuel scenarios people recognize instantly. When participants see their world reflected—tools, timelines, stakeholder quirks—they engage deeply. This grounded realism drives transfer, because the choices you practice mirror the exact tensions you’ll face during performance‑critical exchanges.
Each branch updates relationship temperature, delivery risk, and psychological safety scores. If you deflect blame, later collaboration suffers; if you over‑apologize, standards wobble. The design ties consequences to mechanisms, reinforcing how intent, language, and follow‑through shape future cycles of trust and execution.
Not everyone processes conflict the same way. Scenarios include audio, variable pacing, and tone sliders to explore direct, collaborative, or coaching styles. Practicing the same content across styles builds flexible fluency, so you can adapt to colleagues’ preferences without losing clarity or resolve.